J Neurol Res
Journal of Neurology Research, ISSN 1923-2845 print, 1923-2853 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Neurol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.neurores.org

Original Article

Volume 5, Number 3, June 2015, pages 193-198


The Importance of Some Possible Somatic and Environmental Risk Factors for the Development of Migraine

Han Lea, Peer Tfelt-Hansena, Axel Skyttheb, Kirsten Ohm Kyvikc, d, Jes Olesena, e

aThe Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark
bThe Danish Twin Registry, Epidemiology, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
cInstitute of Regional Health Services Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
dOdense Patient data Explorative Network (OPEN), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
eCorresponding Author: Jes Olesen, Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Glostrup Hospital, Glostrup DK-2600, Denmark

Manuscript accepted for publication May 18, 2015
Short title: Somatic Risk Factors for Migraine
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jnr336w

Abstract▴Top 

Background: The study of risk factors of migraine is important, not least because migraine prevalence seems to increase. The knowledge of risk factors remains limited, however, despite years of research. The objective was to evaluate some possible somatic and environmental risk factors for the development of migraine.

Methods: The Danish Twin Omnibus 1994 and 2002 were questionnaire surveys investigating somatic disorders, lifestyle factors and socioeconomic factors. Both studies used the same validated questions to diagnose migraine. The study population included twin individuals born between 1953 and 1976 who in 1994 reported never to have had migraine. We compared the groups with and without a specific disorder or environmental factor in 1994 with regard to their migraine status in 2002.

Results: This study comprised 13,498 subjects (6,513 men and 6,985 women). The 8-year risk of developing migraine was significantly increased in subjects who already had low back pain (odds ratio (OR) = 1.3; 95% CI = 1.2 - 1.4). Environmental factors associated with an increased risk of development of migraine were low education (OR = 1.3; 95% CI = 1.1 - 1.5), heavy physical workload (OR = 1.1; 95% CI = 1.0 - 1.2), heavy physical recreational activity (OR = 1.2; 95% CI = 1.0 - 1.3) and body mass index (BMI) < 18.5 (OR = 1.3; 95% CI = 1.1 - 1.6). Subjects with weekly or more frequent alcohol consumption had a lower risk of developing migraine compared to subjects with less frequent or no consumption of alcohol (OR = 0.6; 95% CI = 0.6 - 0.7).

Conclusions: This large-scale longitudinal population-based study showed that the risk of development of self-reported migraine was increased in subjects with low back pain, low education, heavy physical workload and heavy physical recreational activity, and decreased in those with frequent alcohol consumption.

Keywords: Migraine; Possible risk factors; Low back pain; Low education; Underweight

Introduction▴Top 

The study of risk factors of migraine is important in order to prevent migraine in the general population. Despite several large studies published recently [1-3], our understanding of the risk factors of migraine remains limited. Several twin studies have shown that the heritability of the migraine phenotype is approximately 40-60% [4-9]. The rest should, therefore, be accounted for by environmental factors. Some factors may affect migraine in a positive and others in a negative way. Our previous cross-sectional studies showed that low level of schooling and education, unemployment or smoking were associated with an increased risk of migraine, whereas an inverse association was seen between physical exercise and migraine [10]. Migraine was co-morbid with several somatic diseases including low back pain, arthritis, thyroid diseases, asthma and allergies, suggesting that such disorders may play a role in the development of migraine [11]. In order to identify factors or diseases that may be potential risk factors and not consequences of migraine, longitudinal studies are required. So far only few longitudinal studies have investigated risk factors of migraine [1, 12-14].

The Danish Twin Omnibus 1994 and 2002 were questionnaire studies among almost 30,000 and 35,000 twin individuals respectively. They included questions regarding migraine, several somatic disorders, lifestyle factors and socioeconomic factors. Both studies used the same validated questions to diagnose migraine as well as its subtypes migraine with aura (MA) and migraine without aura (MO) [15, 16]. In this paper the twin status is disregarded and the material is presented as a random sample from the Danish population, which is acceptable since these twins are representative of the whole Danish population with regard to migraine [17] as well as several other phenotypes, e.g., diabetes [18, 19], asthma [20] and mortality [21]. Subjects who reported never to have had migraine in 1994 (baseline) were followed up in 2002. The aim of the study was to evaluate the possible contribution of some somatic and environmental factors for the development of migraine in an adult population, stratified accordingly to MA and MO as well as sex.

Material and Methods▴Top 

Study population

The Danish Twin Registry is the oldest and most complete national twin registry in the world [15]. The ascertainment of twins has been done in a variety of ways. The Danish Civil Registration System, which has registered all persons living in Denmark since April 2, 1968, was used as the primary source for enrollment of the twins in the present study [15, 16]. Twins born between 1953 and 1982 were identified via the mother assuming that a woman giving birth to more than one child within three consecutive days had twins [22].

Self-reported migraine was identified based on the following questions. 1) Have you ever had migraine? 2) Have you ever had visual disturbances that lasted from 5 to 60 min and were succeeded by a headache?

Subjects answered “yes” to question 1 were classified as having migraine. MA was defined as subjects answering “yes” to both questions, and MO was defined as subjects answering “yes” to question 1 and “no” to question 2. Subjects answering “no” to question 1 were considered healthy. Validation of the screening questions showed that it is possible to identify 76% of all subjects with migraine, 85% of all with MA and 72% of all with MO. A detailed description of the validation of screening questions has been published elsewhere [11].

Our study population included twin individuals born between 1953 and 1976 (both inclusive) who had answered both migraine questions in 1994 and 2002. Those who reported having or having had migraine in 1994 were excluded. We used data from the 1994 survey to establish the exposure status. The outcome was based on self-reported migraine in 2002.

The twin surveys

The Twin Omnibus 1994 and 2002 contained besides the migraine questions also questions about several somatic diseases and environmental factors. In 1994 information about various diseases was based solely on self-report, whereas in 2002 most diagnoses on patients were self-reported physician-made diagnoses. This difference in the questions resulted in big difference in the prevalence of some diagnoses. We included only diagnoses with greater than 70% concordance in the two surveys. We therefore included only epilepsy (89%), asthma (86%) and low back pain (74%) in the analysis. The environmental factors in 1994 included educational level, physical workload, physical recreational activity, smoking status, alcohol consumption, weight and height. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from the height and weight measurements and categorized according to the World Health Organization’s BMI classification [23].

Definition of risk factors

We considered a specific disease (asthma, epilepsy and low back pain in 1994) as a possible risk factor for migraine by comparing the prevalence of self-reported migraine in 2002 in the groups with the specific disease to the prevalence in the group without the specific disease. For the environmental factors we compared the risk of reporting migraine for low education (higher education for less than 3 years) vs. high education (higher education for more than 3 years); high physical workload (work including walk, lift and heavy physical demands) vs. low physical workload (mainly seated or standing); heavy physical recreational activity (2 h or more of heavy physical exercise per week) vs. low physical recreational activity (no or light physical exercise as well as heavy physical exercise less than 2 h per week); current smokers or former smokers vs. non-smokers; regular alcohol consumption (weekly or more frequent) vs. occasional alcohol consumption (less than weekly or no alcohol consumption); underweight, overweight and obese subjects vs. normal weight subjects [23].

Statistical analyses

Univariate analyses were used to investigate the association between migraine and each of the risk factors. We compared the groups with and without a specific disease or environmental factor in 1994 with regard to their migraine status in 2002. We used a generalized estimating equation model to adjust for relatedness. The results were given as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Missing data were excluded from the analyses. All analyses were stratified by migraine subtype and sex. Data analysis was performed with PASW Statistics Version 18.0 by SPSS Inc.

Results▴Top 

A flowchart of the study population is presented in Figure 1. The 13,498 subjects aged 18 - 41 (6,513 men and 6,985 women) did not report having migraine ever in 1994. The mean age of this population was 29 ± 7 years (SD). The risk of developing migraine and its subtypes in 2002 dependent on having one of the three specific diseases evaluated or environmental factors in 1994 is summarized in Table 1 and 2.

Figure 1.
Click for large image
Figure 1. Flowchart of the study population aged 18 - 41.

Table 1.
Click to view
Table 1. Associations Between Asthma, Epilepsy and Low Back Pain and the 8-Year Risk of Development of Migraine in a Danish Population Aged 18 - 41
 

Table 2.
Click to view
Table 2. Associations Between Environmental Factors and the 8-Year Risk of Development of Migraine in a Danish Population Aged 18 - 41
 

We found that the 8-year risk of developing migraine was significantly increased in subjects who in 1994 had low back pain. The risk of developing MA as well as the risk of MO was also significantly increased in subjects with low back pain. Stratification by sex showed that low back pain was associated with the development of migraine both in men (OR = 1.3; 95% CI = 1.1 - 1.6) and in women (OR = 1.3; 95% CI = 1.1 - 1.4). Significant association with the development of MA and MO was also seen in men whereas the association was only significant for MA in women (data not shown). There was no association with migraine observed for asthma (OR = 1.1; 95% CI = 0.9 - 1.4) or epilepsy (OR = 1.1; 95% CI = 0.7 - 1.6) (Table 1).

Environmental factors associated with an increased risk of development of migraine were low education, heavy physical workload, heavy physical recreational activity and underweight. The first three mentioned factors were associated with MO, whereas the risk of developing MA was only significantly increased in underweight subjects. Subjects with alcohol consumption weekly or more had a lower risk of developing migraine as well as MA and MO compared to subjects with occasional or no consumption of alcohol. Stratification by sex also showed this effect of regular alcohol consumption in men for both subtypes (MA: OR = 0.6; 95% CI = 0.4 - 0.8, MO: OR = 0.7; 95% CI = 0.5 - 0.9) but not in women. Heavy physical workload was associated with the development of MO but not MA in men (OR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.2 - 1.7) as well as in women (OR = 1.2; 95% CI = 1.0 - 1.4).

Discussion▴Top 

This 8-year longitudinal study comprised a large representative, non-selective sample (n = 13,498) of the Danish population. The main findings indicated that the development of self-reported migraine was associated with low back pain and several environmental factors. The migraine subtypes MA and MO were associated with different environmental factors, and so were men and women.

The three evaluated disorders as risk factors

In cross-sectional studies we have previously shown that migraine is co-morbid with low back pain, asthma, epilepsy and several other somatic disorders [11]. Of the three diagnoses that could be evaluated in the present study, only low back pain seems, however, to be associated with the development of migraine and its subtypes. Our results agree with a Canadian study that showed an increased risk of migraine development with pre-existing back problems, but the investigators did not segregate the sexes [13]. It is likely that conditions involving musculoskeletal pain increase the risk of developing migraine by inappropriate muscle tension or compensatory structural adjustments of the neck or upper back muscles. A very small American study (n = 46) [24] reported that 46% (95% CI = 19-73%) (6/13) of women developed MO following the onset of low back pain but as shown by the wide 95% CI, this is likely the same as the 18% migraine prevalence in women in the US. No significant difference was seen in men, since only 8% of men (2/26) developed MO [24]. Our study demonstrated that low back pain is associated with the development of migraine in both men and women. The same was true for the male subjects in both MA and MO whereas in women this was only the case for MA. Asthma and epilepsy did not increase the risk of developing migraine in the present study. Asthma has previously been reported as not being a risk factor for the development of migraine [13]. A family study of epilepsy did find the incidence risk of migraine to be 2.4 times higher in subjects with epilepsy than without epilepsy [25]. To our knowledge, no longitudinal population-based study on migraine and epilepsy has been published.

Environmental factors

Previous cross-sectional studies have shown that social factors such as education [10, 26, 27] and socioeconomic status [26, 28] are associated with migraine. It has been suggested that this may be due to downward social drift, but the present data suggest that low education and heavy physical workload may induce migraine. A cohort study of 779 3-year-old children followed for 23 years showed that verbal IQ in childhood was associated with the development of migraine and the chance of school success was 9.5% less for students later diagnosed with migraine [29]. It is possible that factors associated with low education leading to low income may explain these otherwise alarming results. Thus, an unhealthy lifestyle, stress or poor education may be causative factors. Heavy physical workload predisposed to MA in women, but not in men, in one study [10], whereas heavy physical recreational activity is associated with a decreased risk of migraine in most [1, 2, 10] but not all [3] studies.

Exertion of the musculoskeletal apparatus leading to muscle tensions may thus cause the experience of migraine. Migraineurs are likely to avoid physical exertion in order to prevent migraine attacks. Our finding could explain the association found previously between migraine and physical inactivity [2, 5, 10]. Low back pain was more common among subjects with physically demanding work but not with heavy physical activity during leisure time [30]. We found that underweight subjects had a higher risk of developing migraine compared to normal weight subjects, but we could not confirm previous findings of an increased risk in obese persons. Smoking did not increase the risk of developing migraine. This is in keeping with another study showing that smoking during mid-adolescence did not increase the risk of developing frequent headache including migraine in adulthood [5, 31]. However, the risk of new migraine cases has been reported to be higher among current smokers in a cohort study with up to 15-year follow-up period [14]. That study used a slightly younger sample than ours, and it differentiated between former smokers and current smokers. A separate analysis of current smokers at baseline in our study did not show any association with subsequent development of migraine (data not shown). Regular alcohol consumption in 1994 decreased the risk of developing migraine and its subtypes. Migraine sufferers are known to be prone to develop headache and migraine after alcohol consumption [32, 33]. We believe that subjects susceptible to migraine could have experienced non-migraine headaches after alcohol prior to their onset of migraine. This could lead to avoidance behavior towards alcohol in migraine-prone individuals.

Methodological consideration

This study was a population-based twin study with a large sample size (n = 13,498). The subjects were studied twice, 8 years apart. This sample size allowed for the analysis of risk for development of combined migraine, MA and MO for both three somatic disorders and several environmental factors. A limitation was that information on somatic disorders was obtained in 1994 by self-report and in 2002 by self-reported physician-made diagnoses. Thus only asthma, epilepsy and low back pain, which all had a concordance between the two surveys of > 70%, could be used. An additional limitation of this study is that it did not include evaluations of psychiatric disorders.

Conclusions

During a large 8-year longitudinal study, patients with low back pain developed more MA and MO than subjects without this disorder. This was not the case for epilepsy or asthma. Low education and underweight were associated with an increase risk of migraine, and regular alcohol consumption was associated with a decreased risk of MA and MO.

These results should be taken into account when migraine prevention in the general population is considered.


References▴Top 
  1. Varkey E, Hagen K, Zwart JA, Linde M. Physical activity and headache: results from the Nord-Trondelag Health Study (HUNT). Cephalalgia. 2008;28(12):1292-1297.
    doi pubmed
  2. Molarius A, Tegelberg A, Ohrvik J. Socio-economic factors, lifestyle, and headache disorders - a population-based study in Sweden. Headache. 2008;48(10):1426-1437.
    doi pubmed
  3. Winter AC, Hoffmann W, Meisinger C, Evers S, Vennemann M, Pfaffenrath V, Fendrich K, et al. Association between lifestyle factors and headache. J Headache Pain. 2011;12(2):147-155.
    doi pubmed
  4. Gervil M, Ulrich V, Kaprio J, Olesen J, Russell MB. The relative role of genetic and environmental factors in migraine without aura. Neurology. 1999;53(5):995-999.
    doi pubmed
  5. Honkasalo ML, Kaprio J, Winter T, Heikkila K, Sillanpaa M, Koskenvuo M. Migraine and concomitant symptoms among 8167 adult twin pairs. Headache. 1995;35(2):70-78.
    doi pubmed
  6. Larsson B, Bille B, Pedersen NL. Genetic influence in headaches: a Swedish twin study. Headache. 1995;35(9):513-519.
    doi pubmed
  7. Mulder EJ, Van Baal C, Gaist D, Kallela M, Kaprio J, Svensson DA, Nyholt DR, et al. Genetic and environmental influences on migraine: a twin study across six countries. Twin Res. 2003;6(5):422-431.
    doi pubmed
  8. Ulrich V, Gervil M, Kyvik KO, Olesen J, Russell MB. The inheritance of migraine with aura estimated by means of structural equation modelling. J Med Genet. 1999;36(3):225-227.
    pubmed
  9. Ziegler DK, Hur YM, Bouchard TJ, Jr., Hassanein RS, Barter R. Migraine in twins raised together and apart. Headache. 1998;38(6):417-422.
    doi pubmed
  10. Le H, Tfelt-Hansen P, Skytthe A, Kyvik KO, Olesen J. Association between migraine, lifestyle and socioeconomic factors: a population-based cross-sectional study. J Headache Pain. 2011;12(2):157-172.
    doi pubmed
  11. Le H, Tfelt-Hansen P, Russell MB, Skytthe A, Kyvik KO, Olesen J. Co-morbidity of migraine with somatic disease in a large population-based study. Cephalalgia. 2011;31(1):43-64.
    doi pubmed
  12. Breslau N, Davis GC, Andreski P. Migraine, psychiatric disorders, and suicide attempts: an epidemiologic study of young adults. Psychiatry Res. 1991;37(1):11-23.
    doi
  13. Gilmour H, Wilkins K. Migraine. Health Rep. 2001;12(2):23-40.
    pubmed
  14. Hozawa A, Houston T, Steffes MW, Widome R, Williams OD, Iribarren C, Pletcher MJ, et al. The association of cigarette smoking with self-reported disease before middle age: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study. Prev Med. 2006;42(3):193-199.
    doi pubmed
  15. Skytthe A, Kyvik K, Holm NV, Vaupel JW, Christensen K. The Danish Twin Registry: 127 birth cohorts of twins. Twin Res. 2002;5(5):352-357.
    doi pubmed
  16. Skytthe A, Kyvik K, Bathum L, Holm N, Vaupel JW, Christensen K. The Danish Twin Registry in the new millennium. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2006;9(6):763-771.
    doi pubmed
  17. Ulrich V, Gervil M, Fenger K, Olesen J, Russell MB. The prevalence and characteristics of migraine in twins from the general population. Headache. 1999;39(3):173-180.
    doi pubmed
  18. Kyvik KO, Green A, Beck-Nielsen H. Concordance rates of insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: a population based study of young Danish twins. BMJ. 1995;311(7010):913-917.
    doi pubmed
  19. Poulsen P, Kyvik KO, Vaag A, Beck-Nielsen H. Heritability of type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus and abnormal glucose tolerance--a population-based twin study. Diabetologia. 1999;42(2):139-145.
    doi pubmed
  20. Skadhauge LR, Christensen K, Kyvik KO, Sigsgaard T. Genetic and environmental influence on asthma: a population-based study of 11,688 Danish twin pairs. Eur Respir J. 1999;13(1):8-14.
    doi pubmed
  21. Christensen K, Vaupel JW, Holm NV, Yashin AI. Mortality among twins after age 6: fetal origins hypothesis versus twin method. BMJ. 1995;310(6977):432-436.
    doi pubmed
  22. Kyvik KO, Green A, Beck-Nielsen H. The new Danish Twin Register: establishment and analysis of twinning rates. Int J Epidemiol. 1995;24(3):589-596.
    doi pubmed
  23. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000;894:i-xii, 1-253.
    pubmed
  24. Duckro PN, Schultz KT, Chibnall JT. Migraine as a sequela to chronic low back pain. Headache. 1994;34(5):279-281.
    doi pubmed
  25. Ottman R, Lipton RB. Comorbidity of migraine and epilepsy. Neurology. 1994;44(11):2105-2110.
    doi pubmed
  26. Hagen K, Vatten L, Stovner LJ, Zwart JA, Krokstad S, Bovim G. Low socio-economic status is associated with increased risk of frequent headache: a prospective study of 22718 adults in Norway. Cephalalgia. 2002;22(8):672-679.
    doi pubmed
  27. Stang P, Sternfeld B, Sidney S. Migraine headache in a prepaid health plan: ascertainment, demographics, physiological, and behavioral factors. Headache. 1996;36(2):69-76.
    doi pubmed
  28. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Diamond S, Diamond ML, Reed M. Prevalence and burden of migraine in the United States: data from the American Migraine Study II. Headache. 2001;41(7):646-657.
    doi pubmed
  29. Waldie KE, Hausmann M, Milne BJ, Poulton R. Migraine and cognitive function: a life-course study. Neurology. 2002;59(6):904-908.
    doi pubmed
  30. Bjorck-van Dijken C, Fjellman-Wiklund A, Hildingsson C. Low back pain, lifestyle factors and physical activity: a population based-study. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(10):864-869.
    doi pubmed
  31. Waldie KE, McGee R, Reeder AI, Poulton R. Associations between frequent headaches, persistent smoking, and attempts to quit. Headache. 2008;48(4):545-552.
    doi pubmed
  32. Panconesi A. Alcohol and migraine: trigger factor, consumption, mechanisms. A review. J Headache Pain. 2008;9(1):19-27.
    doi pubmed
  33. Rasmussen BK. Migraine and tension-type headache in a general population: precipitating factors, female hormones, sleep pattern and relation to lifestyle. Pain. 1993;53(1):65-72.
    doi


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Journal of Neurology Research is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

     

Journal of clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 

 

 

 

Journal of Neurology Research, bimonthly, ISSN 1923-2845 (print), 1923-2853 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.            
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.neurores.org   editorial contact: editor@neurores.org
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.