J Neurol Res
Journal of Neurology Research, ISSN 1923-2845 print, 1923-2853 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Neurol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.neurores.org

Editorial

Volume 10, Number 4, August 2020, pages 105-106


Thrombolytic Therapy for Stroke: Intravenous Tenecteplase Era

Mohammad Abdolia, Pegah Mohammadib, Ashkan Mowlac, d

aNational Skull Base Foundation, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360, USA
bCalifornia Institute of Neuroscience, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360, USA
cDivision of Endovascular Neurosurgery, Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
dCorresponding Author: Ashkan Mowla, Division of Endovascular Neurosurgery, Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Suite 3300, 1200 North State St., Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA

Manuscript submitted June 8, 2020, accepted June 15, 2020, published online June 30, 2020
Short title: Intravenous Tenecteplase
doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jnr604

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a worldwide health burden and the leading cause of disability in adults. The management of AIS is developing rapidly. Currently, the two Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment options for AIS are intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with alteplase within the first 4.5 h of the AIS symptom onset and endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients with an occlusive clot in one of the intracranial large vessels within the first 24 h of symptom onset depending on the salvageability of the brain tissue [1-10]. Some studies have shown the potential benefit of EVT during the first 16 to 24 h from the AIS symptom onset if there is a favorable penumbra without a large infarct core [11, 12]. Another study revealed that EVT within 6 to 16 h after onset of AIS symptom could decrease the length hospital stay and improve patient functional outcome [13].

Alteplase is an intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rTPA) with a short half-life that needs continuous infusion for about 1 h [14]. Infusion of alteplase as a bridge prior to EVT is still a treatment option for eligible AIS patients with intracranial large vessel occlusions [15-17]. Thus far, alteplase is the only FDA-approved pharmacological treatment for AIS [1, 5, 18]; however, infusion of alteplase has a relatively low rate of recanalization and reperfusion of the large vessel occlusions prior to EVT; hence, it might not be the ideal treatment option [15, 19].

Tenecteplase is a modified form of alteplase with 14-fold more fibrin specificity and enhanced ability for thrombolysis. It also has a longer half-life and 80 times greater resistance to plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 compared to the alteplase; as such, it can be used as an intravenous bolus rather than a bolus followed by 1 h infusion as with alteplase [20]. Single bolus infusion of tenecteplase can give practical benefits to AIS patients who need transportation between hospitals to access EVT [15]. Single bolus infusion of tenecteplase can also reduce the time to receive EVT after the onset of stroke symptoms [16]. Furthermore, according to the information available on drugs.com, in the USA, tenecteplase would cost much less when compared with the alteplase [20].

To the best of our knowledge, at least five randomized clinical trials that compared alteplase with tenecteplase in the treatment of AIS have shown no significant differences in the mortality rate or in the chance of neurological recovery between these two options [15]. Parson et al [18], in a randomized clinical trial on AIS patients who received thrombolytic therapy, found that tenecteplase was superior to alteplase concerning the angiographic outcomes, rate of reperfusion, and also neurological improvement in 24 h. They also showed lower rate of severe disability at 90 days [18].

Campbell et al [15] studied tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg versus the standard dose of alteplase for patients with AIS within 4.5 h of symptom onset prior to EVT. They reported significantly greater chance of reperfusion of the occluded vessel along with meaningfully better chance of 3-month functional outcome [15, 20].

Concerning the safety outcomes, two of the most recent meta-analyses comparing the efficacy and safety of the both treatment options for AIS, found no statistically significant difference in the rates of intracerebral hemorrhage between the two, but there were tendency toward lower rate of intracerebral hemorrhage with tenecteplase (odds ratio (OR): 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56 - 1.17; P = 0.26) [14, 21].

When it comes to the administration of the tenecteplase, current evidences advocate that 0.25 mg/kg (maximum 25 mg) is the most appropriate dose. The 0.1 mg/kg dose was not as effective as 0.25 mg/kg dose in the study by Parsons et al [18], and the 0.4 mg/kg dose may result in higher rates of intracerebral hemorrhage as shown by Haley et al [22].

In conclusion, tenecteplase is shown to be as effective as alteplase with respect to functional outcome after treatment of AIS. Furthermore, it can be used as an intravenous bolus rather than a bolus followed by 1 h infusion as with alteplase which makes it more convenient to administer and may have lower bleeding risks when compared to alteplase. It is also cheaper. Health care providers should contemplate using tenecteplase rather than alteplase for the treatment of AIS at the recommended dose if available in their centers.

Acknowledgments

None to declare.

Financial Disclosure

None to declare.

Conflict of Interest

None to declare.

Author Contributions

All authors have contributed to the theoretical formalism, designing the study, data collection, data analysis and writing the manuscript.

Data Availability

The authors declare that data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.


References▴Top 
  1. Mowla A, Doyle J, Lail NS, Rajabzadeh-Oghaz H, Deline C, Shirani P, Ching M, et al. Delays in door-to-needle time for acute ischemic stroke in the emergency department: A comprehensive stroke center experience. J Neurol Sci. 2017;376:102-105.
    doi pubmed
  2. Mowla A, Singh K, Mehla S, Ahmed MK, Shirani P, Kamal H, Krishna C, et al. Is acute reperfusion therapy safe in acute ischemic stroke patients who harbor unruptured intracranial aneurysm? Int J Stroke. 2015;10(Suppl A100):113-118.
    doi pubmed
  3. National Institute of Neurological, Disorders. Stroke rt, P. A. Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(24):1581-1587.
    doi pubmed
  4. Singh K, Mowla A, Mehla S, Ahmed MK, Shirani P, Zimmer WE, Sawyer RN, et al. Safety of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in patients with preexisting intracranial neoplasms: a case series. Int J Stroke. 2015;10(3):E29-30.
    doi pubmed
  5. Mowla A, Kamal H, Lail NS, Vaughn C, Shirani P, Mehla S, Rajabzadeh-Oghaz H, et al. Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in patients with thrombocytopenia. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;26(7):1414-1418.
    doi pubmed
  6. Kamal H, Mowla A, Farooq S, Shirani P. Recurrent ischemic stroke can happen in stroke patients very early after intravenous thrombolysis. J Neurol Sci. 2015;358(1-2):496-497.
    doi pubmed
  7. AbdelRazek MA, Mowla A, Hojnacki D, Zimmer W, Elsadek R, Abdelhamid N, Elsadek L, et al. Prior asymptomatic parenchymal hemorrhage does not increase the risk for intracranial hemorrhage after intravenous thrombolysis. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;40(5-6):201-204.
    doi pubmed
  8. Rajabzadeh-Oghaz H, Varble N, Davies JM, Mowla A, Shakir HJ, Sonig A, Shallwani H, et al. Computer-assisted adjuncts for aneurysmal morphologic assessment: toward more precise and accurate approaches. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2017:10134.
    doi pubmed
  9. Shahjouei S, Tsivgoulis G, Goyal N, Sadighi A, Mowla A, Wang M, Seiffge DJ, et al. Safety of Intravenous Thrombolysis Among Patients Taking Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Stroke. 2020;51(2):533-541.
    doi pubmed
  10. Namazi MR, Mowla A. Massive right-sided hemorrhagic pleural effusion due to pancreatitis; a case report. BMC Pulm Med. 2004;4:1.
    doi pubmed
  11. Nogueira RG, Jadhav AP, Haussen DC, Bonafe A, Budzik RF, Bhuva P, Yavagal DR, et al. Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(1):11-21.
    doi pubmed
  12. Albers GW, Marks MP, Kemp S, Christensen S, Tsai JP, Ortega-Gutierrez S, McTaggart RA, et al. Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(8):708-718.
    doi pubmed
  13. Tate WJ, Polding LC, Kemp S, Mlynash M, Heit JJ, Marks MP, Albers GW, et al. Thrombectomy results in reduced hospital stay, more home-time, and more favorable living situations in DEFUSE 3. Stroke. 2019;50(9):2578-2581.
    doi pubmed
  14. Kheiri B, Osman M, Abdalla A, Haykal T, Ahmed S, Hassan M, Bachuwa G, et al. Tenecteplase versus alteplase for management of acute ischemic stroke: a pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2018;46(4):440-450.
    doi pubmed
  15. Campbell BCV, Mitchell PJ, Churilov L, Yassi N, Kleinig TJ, Dowling RJ, Yan B, et al. Tenecteplase versus alteplase before thrombectomy for ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(17):1573-1582.
    doi pubmed
  16. Baird AE. Paving the way for improved treatment of acute stroke with tenecteplase. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(17):1635-1636.
    doi pubmed
  17. Seifi A, Mowla A, Vaziri MM, Talei AR, Namazy MR. Insulin adsorbance to polyvinylchloride (PVC) surfaces of fluid container and infusion-set. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2004;17(5):975-981.
    pubmed
  18. Parsons M, Spratt N, Bivard A, Campbell B, Chung K, Miteff F, O'Brien B, et al. A randomized trial of tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(12):1099-1107.
    doi pubmed
  19. Logallo N, Kvistad CE, Nacu A, Naess H, Waje-Andreassen U, Asmuss J, Aamodt AH, et al. The Norwegian tenecteplase stroke trial (NOR-TEST): randomised controlled trial of tenecteplase vs. alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke. BMC Neurol. 2014;14:106.
    doi pubmed
  20. Zitek T, Ataya R, Brea I. Using tenecteplase for acute ischemic stroke: what is the hold up? West J Emerg Med. 2020;21(2):199-202.
    doi pubmed
  21. Burgos AM, Saver JL. Evidence that tenecteplase is noninferior to alteplase for acute ischemic stroke: meta-analysis of 5 randomized trials. Stroke. 2019;50(8):2156-2162.
    doi pubmed
  22. Haley EC, Jr., Thompson JL, Grotta JC, Lyden PD, Hemmen TG, Brown DL, Fanale C, et al. Phase IIB/III trial of tenecteplase in acute ischemic stroke: results of a prematurely terminated randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 2010;41(4):707-711.
    doi pubmed


This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Journal of Neurology Research is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Journal of Neurology Research, biannually, ISSN 1923-2845 (print), 1923-2853 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.neurores.org   editorial contact: editor@neurores.org
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.