J Neurol Res
Journal of Neurology Research, ISSN 1923-2845 print, 1923-2853 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Neurol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.neurores.org

Original Article

Volume 10, Number 4, August 2020, pages 127-131


Seizures With Major Comorbidity and Complications: Association of the Teaching Status of the Hospitals With the Outcomes

Aparna Yarrama, Ali Seifib, Vahid Eslamib, c

aSchool of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
bDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
cCorresponding Author: Vahid Eslami, Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA

Manuscript submitted May 20, 2020, accepted June 10, 2020, published online June 17, 2020
Short title: Seizure Outcomes and Hospital Teaching Status
doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jnr588

Abstract▴Top 

Background: This study aims to compare the outcomes of complicated seizure cases in teaching institutions as compared to non-teaching hospitals.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted utilizing the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) national database to analyze outcomes of seizures between 2012 and 2016 in the USA.

Results: We evaluated 267,430 of seizure patients with major complication or comorbidity between 2012 and 2016. Of these, 6,980 in-hospital deaths were reported. There was a trend toward a significantly higher mortality in teaching compared with non-teaching hospitals (P = 0.07). The average length of stay (LOS) was 5.2 days, with LOS in 2014 and 2016, being longer in teaching hospitals (P < 0.05). Hospital charges were not significantly different among the two groups, but both types of hospitals did show a statistically significant charge increase from 2012 to 2016 (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Our data showed that there is a trend toward significantly higher mortality in teaching hospitals. LOS was also more reported in teaching hospitals, which could be inherent to the increased volume and coordination of care and more complexity of the cases in teaching hospitals. However, hospital charges were not different in teaching versus non-teaching hospitals.

Keywords: Epilepsy; Teaching hospitals; Outcomes

Introduction▴Top 

World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that up to 10% of the population worldwide will have at least one seizure during their lifetime [1]. Seizures account for 1-2% of all emergency department visits, and approximately 25% of these visits are noted to be a first-time seizure [2, 3]. New-onset seizures may occur due to central nervous system (CNS) infections, tumors, chemical and metabolic imbalances, drugs, etc., and maybe a one-time event. However, seizures are most commonly part of a chronic condition characterized by recurrent seizure events known as epilepsy. Epilepsy affects 50 million people worldwide, and in 2015, 1.2% of the USA population reported active epilepsy [4]. Epilepsy and seizures contribute to many comorbidities, including neuropsychiatric issues, and significantly impact the patient’s quality of life [5]. Investigating what factors contribute to mortality in epilepsy patients will allow us to gain a better understanding of how to improve treatment and decrease hospitalizations for these patients.

Past studies comparing overall hospitalizations for all medical illnesses have shown that there is a significant decrease in mortality in major teaching hospitals compared to non-teaching hospitals [6]; however, complicated seizures, defined as seizure cases with major comorbidity and complications during their hospitalizations, have not been studied in depth in the literature. In order to better understand the differences amongst teaching and non-teaching hospitals, our study aims to compare the mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS) and hospital charges of complicated seizure cases with other comorbidities that are occurring in teaching institutions as compared to the non-teaching hospitals in the USA.

Materials and Methods▴Top 

We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project network (HCUPnet) national database to compare mortality, LOS, and hospital charges of patients presenting with seizures in teaching vs. non-teaching hospitals between 2012 and 2016. HCUP is a national database and software tool sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). The database represents the most extensive collection of longitudinal hospital care data in the USA, including the synthesis of data from state healthcare centers, hospital associations, private institutions, and the federal government.

We identified patients categorized under Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Groups (MS-DRGs) with the code number 100 for seizure cases with major comorbidity and complications. We compiled total values of discharges and compared the data against different categories such as in-hospital deaths, hospital LOS, and hospital charges. Trends during the 5 years of study were evaluated using the z-test statistic and P values using a two-tail test with a significance of less than 0.05. The HCUP is an anonymous database and fully complied with the ethical standards and received “exempt” status from the Institutional Review Board (HSC-2015-0408N).

Results▴Top 

Demographics

We evaluated 267,430 of seizure patients with major complication or comorbidity between 2012 and 2016. The prevalence of the seizure discharges slightly increased from 60,825 in 2012 to 71,350 in 2016 with an average rate of 18.88 in 100,000 persons. The mean age of the total cohort had minimal variation and was 49.2 years. Male patients had a slightly younger age at presentation, with an average of 47.1 years, and female patients had an average age of 51.5 years. Male patients made up 52.2% of the discharges in this cohort (Table 1).

Table 1.
Click to view
Table 1. Patient and Hospital Demographics Between Teaching and Non-Teaching Institutions
 

In-hospital deaths

The average number of in-hospital deaths for each of the 5 years analyzed was 1,396, with a total of 6,980, and mean 2.16% deaths per discharges. The absolute number of in-hospital deaths remained relatively consistent yearly, ranging between 1,315 and 1,530. The average percentage of deaths in teaching hospitals from 2012 to 2016 was 2.19%, and in non-teaching hospitals was 2.12%. There was a trend toward significant higher mortality in teaching compared with non-teaching hospitals (P = 0.07) (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.
Click for large image
Figure 1. Trend of annual in-hospital deaths for seizures in teaching vs. non-teaching hospitals in USA from 2012 to 2016.

LOS

The average LOS for the years examined was 5.2 days and ranged from 5.1 to 5.3 days. The average LOS in teaching hospitals was 5.3 ± 0.5 days, whereas the average LOS in non-teaching hospitals was 5.0 days. There was a significant increase in LOS in teaching hospitals compared with non-teaching hospitals in the years 2014 and 2016, P < 0.05 (Fig. 2). In 2014, the mean LOS in teaching hospital was 5.31, while in the non-teaching hospital was 4.97 (P = 0.02). In 2016, the LOS in teaching hospital was 5.40, and the average in the non-teaching hospital was 4.92 (P < 0.001). The remainder of the years was not significantly different in between the two types of hospitals (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.
Click for large image
Figure 2. Trend of hospital LOS for seizures in teaching vs. non-teaching hospitals in USA from 2012 to 2016. LOS: length of stay.

Hospital charges

The total average hospital charges for patients presented with seizures between 2012 and 2016 were $48,975 and ranged from $43,704 in 2012 to $55,500 in 2016. The average hospital charges in teaching hospitals were $50,382, whereas, in non-teaching hospitals, the average was $49,169 (P > 0.05, Fig. 3). There was a significant increase in hospital charges in both teaching and non-teaching hospitals from 2012 to 2016. Teaching hospitals had an average hospital charge of $44,626 in 2012 to $57,443 in 2016 (P < 0.001), and non-teaching hospitals had an average hospital charge of $45,442 in 2012 to $54,228 in 2016 (P < 0.001).

Figure 3.
Click for large image
Figure 3. Trend of hospital charges for seizures in teaching vs. non-teaching hospitals in USA from 2012 to 2016.
Discussion▴Top 

Our study examined outcomes of patients with seizures from 2012 to 2016 among teaching hospitals and non-teaching hospitals in the USA. Our findings showed that there is a trend toward significant higher mortality in teaching compared with non-teaching hospitals. In 2014 and 2016, there was a substantial increase in the LOS of seizure patients in teaching hospitals as compared to non-teaching hospitals. The costs of inpatient hospitalizations did not differ between the two groups of teaching and non-teaching hospitals. One explanation could be faster admission-to-discharge process, but more costly procedures in non-teaching hospitals. The other possibility is prolonged LOS in teaching hospitals, but as costly as non-teaching hospitals. Teaching hospitals are known for very specialized care and for treatment of uncommon or rare diseases [7]. However, for more frequent conditions, teaching hospitals may provide a lower care than non-teaching hospitals, because teaching hospitals may have a high contribution of inexperienced trainees and decreased role of senior physicians. This may end in more LOS, with higher costs seen in teaching hospitals [7]. Mortality of seizure and epilepsy-related deaths in hospitals has been shown to be decreasing in the last two decades [8]. We found higher mortality in teaching hospitals compared with non-teaching ones. No prior study was found in epilepsy. However, literature has conflicting reports regarding hospital mortality in teaching hospitals in other fields. For example, Hyder et al presented improved mortality of patients undergoing hepatopancreatobiliary surgeries in teaching hospitals [9]; and Fineberg et al demonstrated increased mortality and hospitalizations of patients undergoing cervical spine surgery in teaching hospitals [10]. However, it has been shown consistently that even in studies that observed higher mortality in teaching hospitals, teaching hospitals performed more complex procedures and had superior outcomes for these complex surgical procedures compared to non-teaching hospitals [10]. There is also previous evidence to suggest that higher patient and procedural complexity is often noted at teaching hospitals that contribute to the greater complications and morbidity associated with teaching hospitals [10]. It is also been observed that other factors such as age and comorbidities have a much higher impact on mortality than does the teaching status of a hospital [10, 11]. Our study suggests that in the case of seizures, both teaching and non-teaching hospitals likely practice the same standard of care, and treat similar complexity of seizure caseloads such that there is no observed difference in percentage of in-hospital deaths.

Previous studies have often suggested higher hospital charges among teaching hospitals as compared to non-teaching hospitals. Iezzoni et al particularly observed this difference in tertiary teaching hospitals. They reported that disease-specific severity and the comorbidity index were shown to have a strong linear relationship to DRG-associated costs and accounted for much of the perceived higher costs when comparing tertiary teaching hospitals to non-teaching hospitals. However, such differences were not noted among non-tertiary teaching hospitals [12]. Furthermore, our study did not differentiate between the levels of teaching hospitals and found no difference between hospital charges. This may be due to the limitations of our study that was unable to stratify teaching levels. While studies regarding in-hospital charges of seizures are limited, there appears to be a significant increase in hospital charges in both teaching and non-teaching hospitals in comparing average 2012 to 2016. These charges are likely due to a combination of advancing technology, previously labeled as the main driver of health care expenditure, as well as general and medical inflation and population growth and demand for hospital resources [13, 14]. These factors do not differ between teaching and non-teaching hospitals and would be a possible explanation as to why teaching status did not alter hospital charges in our study.

Our study demonstrated that teaching hospitals did have a significantly higher LOS compared to non-teaching hospitals in 2 of the 5 years analyzed. There are conflicting studies on LOS between teaching and non-teaching hospitals, with a sparsity of topics related to epilepsy and seizures. Hayanga et al demonstrated and commented on the longer LOS observed in major teaching hospitals, particularly when examined in the context of specialized procedures [15]. This is possibly due to the fact that teaching hospitals have more complicated patients with comorbidities and moreover, complex systems of care set in place for the higher volume and higher complexity of patients they admit. These systems, though may improve outcomes for complex patients, may also increase LOS in patients overall. Differences in resource allocation and coordination of care may also account for the longer LOS seen in teaching hospitals due to the training physician staff and higher volume of patients [10]. These factors all possibly contribute to the increased LOS we observed in our study. However, further research needs to be conducted to investigate if patient demographics and comorbidities differ between teaching and non-teaching hospitals in the context of those presenting with seizures, and whether these factors impact mortality, LOS, and hospital charges outcomes. Further investigation is needed to stratify patient complexities and hospital characteristics in order to determine if there is ever a need for teaching status to play a role in decision in treatment.

Conclusions

Our data showed that the teaching and non-teaching hospitals do not have a significant difference in mortality for patients with seizures associated with complication or comorbidity. There might however be an increased LOS in teaching hospitals, but regardless hospital charges remain relatively consistent regardless of the teaching status.

Acknowledgments

None to declare.

Financial Disclosure

Authors have no financial disclosure relevant to this article.

Conflict of Interest

Authors have no conflict of interest relevant to this article.

Informed Consent

Not applicable.

Author Contributions

AY: writing the manuscript and entire analysis; AS: mentor and design of the project. VE edited, added and rewrote significant parts of the draft.

Data Availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available to public at: https://hcupnet.ahrq.gov/#setup.


References▴Top 
  1. Epilepsy. World Health Organization. 2019. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/epilepsy. Accessed on March 25, 2020.
  2. Huff JS, Morris DL, Kothari RU, Gibbs MA, Emergency Medicine Seizure Study G. Emergency department management of patients with seizures: a multicenter study. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8(6):622-628.
    doi pubmed
  3. Martindale JL, Goldstein JN, Pallin DJ. Emergency department seizure epidemiology. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2011;29(1):15-27.
    doi pubmed
  4. Zack MM, Kobau R. National and state estimates of the numbers of adults and children with active epilepsy - United States, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66(31):821-825.
    doi pubmed
  5. Ottman R, Lipton RB, Ettinger AB, Cramer JA, Reed ML, Morrison A, Wan GJ. Comorbidities of epilepsy: results from the Epilepsy Comorbidities and Health (EPIC) survey. Epilepsia. 2011;52(2):308-315.
    doi pubmed
  6. Burke LG, Frakt AB, Khullar D, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Association between teaching status and mortality in US hospitals. JAMA. 2017;317(20):2105-2113.
    doi pubmed
  7. Ayanian JZ, Weissman JS. Teaching hospitals and quality of care: a review of the literature. Milbank Q. 2002;80(3):569-593, v.
    doi pubmed
  8. Stowers J, Ahmadi N, Seifi A. The trend of in-hospital epilepsy and its mortality in the USA: a national analysis during 1997 - 2014. Journal of Neurology Research. 2020;10:3-6.
    doi
  9. Hyder O, Sachs T, Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Pawlik TM. Impact of hospital teaching status on length of stay and mortality among patients undergoing complex hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery in the USA. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(12):2114-2122.
    doi pubmed
  10. Fineberg SJ, Oglesby M, Patel AA, Pelton MA, Singh K. Outcomes of cervical spine surgery in teaching and non-teaching hospitals. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(13):1089-1096.
    doi pubmed
  11. Sandhu A, Moscucci M, Dixon S, Wohns DH, Share D, LaLonde T, Smith D, et al. Differences in the outcome of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions at teaching versus non-teaching hospitals. Am Heart J. 2013;166(3):401-408.
    doi pubmed
  12. Iezzoni LI, Shwartz M, Moskowitz MA, Ash AS, Sawitz E, Burnside S. Illness severity and costs of admissions at teaching and nonteaching hospitals. JAMA. 1990;264(11):1426-1431.
    doi pubmed
  13. Chandra A, Skinner J. Technology growth and expenditure growth in health care. Journal of Economic Literature. 2012;50(3):645-680.
    doi
  14. Ashby JL, Jr., Lisk CK. Why do hospital costs continue to increase? Health Aff (Millwood). 1992;11(2):134-147.
    doi pubmed
  15. Hayanga AJ, Mukherjee D, Chang D, Kaiser H, Lee T, Gearhart S, Ahuja N, et al. Teaching hospital status and operative mortality in the United States: tipping point in the volume-outcome relationship following colon resections? Arch Surg. 2010;145(4):346-350.
    doi pubmed


This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Journal of Neurology Research is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Journal of Neurology Research, biannually, ISSN 1923-2845 (print), 1923-2853 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.neurores.org   editorial contact: editor@neurores.org    elmer.editorial@hotmail.com
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.