Journal of Neurology Research, ISSN 1923-2845 print, 1923-2853 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Neurol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://www.neurores.org

Original Article

Volume 11, Number 5, October 2021, pages 87-93


An Observational Study of an Epilepsy Monitoring Unit in a Level 4 Epilepsy Center, Post-Implementation of the National Association of Epilepsy Centers 2010 Revised Guidelines

Figure

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of patient inclusion and exclusion. EMU: epilepsy monitoring unit.

Tables

Table 1. Demographics of Age, Gender, and Ethnicity Stratified in Groups That Received Intervention Versus Those Having No Change in Management
 
TotalInterventionNo change
Age40.8 ± 1740.2 ± 16.942.5 ± 17.4
Gender
  Male15011337
  Female23416965
Ethnicity
  White21515659
  Black/African American/African746113
  Latino/Hispanic28217
  Asian/South Asian231310
  American Indian or Native Alaskan321
  Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander211
  Other/not reported392811

 

Table 2. Diagnostic Outcomes of Patients With EMU Admissions
 
Frequency (%)
EMU: epilepsy monitoring unit.
Diagnosis received346 (90.1%)
  Epileptic seizures256 (66.7%)
  Non-epileptic events55 (14.3%)
  Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures33 (8.6%)
  Psychogenic events and epilepsy2 (0.5%)
No diagnosis received38 (9.9%)
  EMU events, no diagnosis5 (1.3%)
  No events, no diagnosis33 (8.6%)

 

Table 3. Interventions as a Result of EMU Evaluation
 
Frequency (%)
Interventions not mutually exclusive and total frequency of interventions may exceed the number of enrolled patients. EMU: epilepsy monitoring unit; RNS: responsive neurostimulator; VNS: vagus nerve stimulator; Wada: intracarotid sodium amobarbital procedure.
Intervention performed282 (73.40%)
  Medication264 (68.80%)
    Medication change264 (68.80%)
  Surgical intervention53 (13.80%)
    Resection2 (0.52%)
    RNS6 (1.56%)
    VNS45 (11.70%)
  Intervention by diagnostic studies23 (5.99%)
    Wada9 (2.34%)
    Intracranial electrode placement/phase II monitoring14 (3.65%)
No intervention performed102 (26.60%)