J Neurol Res

Journal of Neurology Research, ISSN 1923-2845 print, 1923-2853 online, Open Access

Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Neurol Res and Elmer Press Inc

Journal website http://www.neurores.org

Original Article

Volume 7, Number 4-5, October 2017, pages 80-84

Comparative Study of the Prognosis of Ischemic Cerebral Stroke Subtypes

Tables

**Table 1.** Correlation Between Etiological Stroke Subtypes and Stroke Outcome
TOAST	Outcome (N, %)				Test	P value
TOAST	Favorable (N = 28)		Unfavorable (N = 15)		Test	P value
Cardio-embolic stroke	3	10.7	2	13.3	0.25	0.239
Large vessel stroke	6	21.4	10	66.6	2.92	0.003
Small vessel stroke	16	57.2	1	6.7	3.22	< 0.001
Cryptogenic stroke	3	10.7	2	13.3	0.25	0.239

**Table 2.** Correlation Between Stroke Severity on Admission and Stroke Outcome
NIHSS	Outcome (N, %)				Test	P value
NIHSS	Favorable (N = 28)		Unfavorable (N = 15)		Test	P value
NIHSS: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.
Mild	17	60.7	0	0.0	3.88	< 0.001
Moderate	11	39.3	9	60.0	1.29	0.193
Severe	0	0.0	2	13.3	1.97	0.047
Very severe	0	0.0	4	26.7	2.86	0.041

**Table 3.** Correlation Between the Site of Stroke and its Outcome
OCSP	Outcome (N, %)				Test	P value
OCSP	Favorable (N = 28)		Unfavorable (N = 15)		Test	P value
OCSP: Oxford Community Stroke Project; PACS: partial anterior circulation stroke; POC: posterior circulation stroke; LAC: lacunar stroke; TAC: total anterior circulation stroke.
PACS	10	35.72	9	60	1.52	0.126
POCS	2	7.14	1	6.7	0.05	0.952
LACS	16	57.14	1	6.7	3.22	0.001
TACS	0	0	4	26.6	2.86	0.004

**Table 4.** Correlation Between the Size of Stroke and its Outcome
Lesion size	Outcome (N, %)				Test	P value
Lesion size	Favorable (N = 28)		Unfavorable (N = 15)		Test	P value
< 1.5 mm (small)	18	64.2	2	13.3	3.19	0.001
1.5 - 3 mm (medium)	9	32.2	8	53.4	1.35	0.177
3 mm (large)	1	3.6	5	33.3	2.86	0.007